Skip to main content

Wide Sargasso Sea and The Yellow Wallpaper


Wide Sargasso by Jean Rhys Sea is similar to another short story we read in previous English classes. In subbie year we read The Yellow Wallpaper by Charlotte Perkins Gilman (or at least the current juniors did). Wide Sargasso Sea has a lot of similarities, especially Antionette’s confinement in England, with the Yellow Wallpaper. Just to refresh anyone who doesn’t remember the Yellow Wallpaper. It’s told from the point of view of a woman whose recently given birth. However, she feels a detachment from her baby (postpartum depression based on a modern diagnosis). Her husband, John, puts her a room in their colonial mansion with torn yellow wallpaper and scratched floors as a “rest cure”. Her only stimulus is the wallpaper. She starts to envision a figure creeping behind the wall. At the end of the story, she tears off the wallpaper as she tries to free the figure. When her husband comes in, she is crawling on the floor and has “become” the figure in the wallpaper. Overall, it’s a very great short story about a woman’s mental decline due to isolation.

A similar thing seems to occur to Antionette in The Wide Sargasso Sea. Antionette is renamed to “Bertha” and is locked away in the attic with little to no simulation. In the Yellow wallpaper the narrator is unnamed until the very end. There is a clear lack of identity with Antionette and the narrator. They have been stripped of who they are and remain as objects locked away. Antionette even says that “names matter”.

The narrator notices patterns and becomes consumed in observing the yellow wallpaper. Antionette also notices a tapestry where, “looking at the tapestry one day I recognized my mother dressed in an evening gown but with bare feet”. Not only that but behind the tapestry is a door that leads to the passage out of the attic. The tapestry leads to her freedom but is also the form that stops her from freedom. The narrator feels similar to her room’s yellow wallpaper. It causes her both hatred and pleasure. At first, she notices its hideous color and pattern but then she becomes absorbed in scanning it for the “figure”. She is both trapped and freed by the wallpaper.

Antionette and the narrator are both trapped by their husbands however there is a key difference between them. The narrator’s husband locks her because he believes he is helping her. John, the husband, is told by doctors that the way to treat the Narrator’s illness (which we know is postpartum depression) is to let her “rest”. However, he is also dismissive of the narrator even when she tries to explain her feeling and illness. Antionette is lock away for a much different reason. Rochester does not want to help her but rather to make her disappear. He no longer needs her, so he wants to forget her. Even though John has different motives both works essentially the same. In both cases Antionette and the narrator start to lose their self of identity. They take on completely different personas. Antionette becomes “Bertha Mason” while the narrator becomes the wild figure in the wallpaper. Their isolation and obsession with their environment make them implode. However, both of them break free of the imprisonment. The narrator becomes the figure and attacks her husband. She is freed and becomes a savage, violent figure. Antionette burns town the mansion that has confined her. Their last act of “wildness” is also their last act of self-identity.

Comments

  1. I really like this comparison, and I think it brings out the patriarchal notions of both stories, with both of the women's husbands having power over their wives to drive them into their respective corners of madness. I think it illuminates the patriarchal nature of the time even more in that the motives for John and Rochester are vastly different, as you mentioned, but they both resorted to the same thing, forcing their will over their wives.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Wow, there are a lot of parallels here! The imagery of a woman locked away in the attic and going mad as a result is strikingly similar. But I think your comparison of the ends is also very interesting because it's like a breaking point for both characters, where they try to take back power that they have lost.

    ReplyDelete
  3. This is really interesting! When I was reading the final part of Wide Sargasso Sea, I also noticed that it was very similar to The Yellow Wallpaper, especially when Antoinette saw the woman in the tapestry. Her absolute confinement echoed the narrator's confinement in The Yellow Wallpaper, except it seems to be less for Antoinette's own good (although John made the wrong choice to help his wife, he did intend to help her). It may be better for everyone to lock Antoinette away, but it is by no means meant to help her get better. Rather, it is meant to keep her locked away until she withers away, eventually dies, and is no longer a danger to the world.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I think the idea that the locking away of Antoinette is to prevent her from becoming a danger to the world (from Rochester's point of view) is really interesting, because that very action is what ultimately leads to the destruction of Rochester's former identity (his house, his eyesight, his pride, etc.). In a similar way, I feel it's ironic that the treatment meant to allow someone to recover from depression ends in driving someone completely insane.

      Delete
  4. This is really interesting because I had also made this connection when we were discussing it in class (I also mentioned it in a comment on Jenna's post). However I really like this post because you've made connections and thought about this much deeper than I have. I didn't even notice the relationship between the wallpaper and the red tapestry but I think that is very interesting and relevant because their experiences are very similar. I think that the shared experience of these women says a lot about the way that mental illness was looked at the time.

    ReplyDelete
  5. I hadn't yet considered the parallels between Wide Sargasso Sea and the Yellow Wallpaper, but your post brings up a lot of interesting similarities between the two texts. It's interesting to compare John and Rochester's different reasons for imprisoning their wives, but both men know what they are causing the women pain. Even though John thinks he's doing the right thing, he must be able to notice that his wife is suffering because of the rest cure. Rochester knows that what he's doing is morally wrong, but he continues to punish Antoinette because he has the power to do so.

    ReplyDelete
  6. I think that this is a very compelling comparison, but I would argue that Antoinette's isolation starts from her early childhood, arguably never forming a proper relationship with anyone except Christophine, leading her to become dependent on Rochester, just like the narrator was of the shape in the wall.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

A double Metamorphosis?

At the end of the “Metamorphosis”, as Gregor is dying “his last faint breath ebbed out of his nostrils” (108). However, insects don’t have nostrils (as we learn in Bug Bio), instead they breath throughout their body. They have spiracles and tracheas that let air get in and out of their body. There is no existing insect that has nostrils. So why did Kafka include this line? For the rest of the book he was pretty accurate in describing insects. Gregor is a dorsal ventrally compressed insect without wings and it seems like 6+ legs. Kafka also describes very vividly the brow liquid (digestive enzymes?) that comes from Gregor’s mouth when he opens the doors. Kafka has done his research when it comes to bugs so why would he include this line about nostrils? I think that as Gregor is dying he has another semi-metamorphism where he partly back to a human. He is able to breathe through his nostrils as a human. However, when he is found dead he is once again an insect. I th...

Mrs. Dalloway’s Drama Filled Day

While we are still reading through Mrs. Dalloway (being only 40-50 pages in right now) I find it interesting (to quote Howie) how a lot of things already seem to have happened. I know that Clarissa just started her day and is walking around and that isn’t too important, but a lot of things seem to be happening on this day. First of all, she has just recovered from a serious case of influenzas (something we talked about in class) and that this is her first real outing. Mrs. Dalloway seems to really be reflecting on her life. Then she hears a motor car backfire and “might” have seen the queen or some other important royalty. If I had almost seen royalty (or a celebrity which is the modern equivalent) I would definitely consider that the highlight of my month but then immediately afterword Mrs. Dalloway sees skywriting. Skywriting would have been new and exciting for that time and Mrs. Dalloway seems to also have been awed by this. After Mrs. Dalloway gets home her former lover (or ...