Wide
Sargasso by Jean Rhys Sea is similar to another short story we read in previous
English classes. In subbie year we read The Yellow Wallpaper by Charlotte
Perkins Gilman (or at least the current juniors did). Wide Sargasso Sea has a lot
of similarities, especially Antionette’s confinement in England, with the
Yellow Wallpaper. Just to refresh anyone who doesn’t remember the Yellow
Wallpaper. It’s told from the point of view of a woman whose recently given
birth. However, she feels a detachment from her baby (postpartum depression
based on a modern diagnosis). Her husband, John, puts her a room in their colonial
mansion with torn yellow wallpaper and scratched floors as a “rest cure”. Her
only stimulus is the wallpaper. She starts to envision a figure creeping behind
the wall. At the end of the story, she tears off the wallpaper as she tries to
free the figure. When her husband comes in, she is crawling on the floor and
has “become” the figure in the wallpaper. Overall, it’s a very great short
story about a woman’s mental decline due to isolation.
A similar
thing seems to occur to Antionette in The Wide Sargasso Sea. Antionette is
renamed to “Bertha” and is locked away in the attic with little to no
simulation. In the Yellow wallpaper the narrator is unnamed until the very end.
There is a clear lack of identity with Antionette and the narrator. They have
been stripped of who they are and remain as objects locked away. Antionette
even says that “names matter”.
The
narrator notices patterns and becomes consumed in observing the yellow
wallpaper. Antionette also notices a tapestry where, “looking at the tapestry
one day I recognized my mother dressed in an evening gown but with bare feet”.
Not only that but behind the tapestry
is a door that leads to the passage out of the attic. The tapestry leads to her
freedom but is also the form that stops her from freedom. The narrator feels
similar to her room’s yellow wallpaper. It causes her both hatred and pleasure.
At first, she notices its hideous color and pattern but then she becomes absorbed
in scanning it for the “figure”. She is both trapped and freed by the wallpaper.
Antionette
and the narrator are both trapped by their husbands however there is a key
difference between them. The narrator’s husband locks her because he believes
he is helping her. John, the husband, is told by doctors that the way to treat
the Narrator’s illness (which we know is postpartum depression) is to let her “rest”.
However, he is also dismissive of the narrator even when she tries to explain
her feeling and illness. Antionette is lock away for a much different reason.
Rochester does not want to help her but rather to make her disappear. He no
longer needs her, so he wants to forget her. Even though John has different
motives both works essentially the same. In both cases Antionette and the narrator
start to lose their self of identity. They take on completely different
personas. Antionette becomes “Bertha Mason” while the narrator becomes the wild
figure in the wallpaper. Their isolation and obsession with their environment
make them implode. However, both of them break free of the imprisonment. The
narrator becomes the figure and attacks her husband. She is freed and becomes a
savage, violent figure. Antionette burns town the mansion that has confined her.
Their last act of “wildness” is also their last act of self-identity.
I really like this comparison, and I think it brings out the patriarchal notions of both stories, with both of the women's husbands having power over their wives to drive them into their respective corners of madness. I think it illuminates the patriarchal nature of the time even more in that the motives for John and Rochester are vastly different, as you mentioned, but they both resorted to the same thing, forcing their will over their wives.
ReplyDeleteWow, there are a lot of parallels here! The imagery of a woman locked away in the attic and going mad as a result is strikingly similar. But I think your comparison of the ends is also very interesting because it's like a breaking point for both characters, where they try to take back power that they have lost.
ReplyDeleteThis is really interesting! When I was reading the final part of Wide Sargasso Sea, I also noticed that it was very similar to The Yellow Wallpaper, especially when Antoinette saw the woman in the tapestry. Her absolute confinement echoed the narrator's confinement in The Yellow Wallpaper, except it seems to be less for Antoinette's own good (although John made the wrong choice to help his wife, he did intend to help her). It may be better for everyone to lock Antoinette away, but it is by no means meant to help her get better. Rather, it is meant to keep her locked away until she withers away, eventually dies, and is no longer a danger to the world.
ReplyDeleteI think the idea that the locking away of Antoinette is to prevent her from becoming a danger to the world (from Rochester's point of view) is really interesting, because that very action is what ultimately leads to the destruction of Rochester's former identity (his house, his eyesight, his pride, etc.). In a similar way, I feel it's ironic that the treatment meant to allow someone to recover from depression ends in driving someone completely insane.
DeleteThis is really interesting because I had also made this connection when we were discussing it in class (I also mentioned it in a comment on Jenna's post). However I really like this post because you've made connections and thought about this much deeper than I have. I didn't even notice the relationship between the wallpaper and the red tapestry but I think that is very interesting and relevant because their experiences are very similar. I think that the shared experience of these women says a lot about the way that mental illness was looked at the time.
ReplyDeleteI hadn't yet considered the parallels between Wide Sargasso Sea and the Yellow Wallpaper, but your post brings up a lot of interesting similarities between the two texts. It's interesting to compare John and Rochester's different reasons for imprisoning their wives, but both men know what they are causing the women pain. Even though John thinks he's doing the right thing, he must be able to notice that his wife is suffering because of the rest cure. Rochester knows that what he's doing is morally wrong, but he continues to punish Antoinette because he has the power to do so.
ReplyDeleteI think that this is a very compelling comparison, but I would argue that Antoinette's isolation starts from her early childhood, arguably never forming a proper relationship with anyone except Christophine, leading her to become dependent on Rochester, just like the narrator was of the shape in the wall.
ReplyDelete